Week4:What is your evaluation of this week’s groupwork? (What went well and what did not? How did groupwork influence fulfilling your personal learning contract?)
Our group page http://tallinnuniversityprojects.pbworks.com/
We had first skype meeting where we discussed our home work. I think all went well, because everyone in group paricpate in homework.This week we had group work. We met the with group members in Skype. Was nice to do group work which was multicultural. However everything went well. Everyone did work and wrote own things to shared Google Docs document.
Explain, what are the components of course design.
Material-these must be cleared. Also there should be good grammatics and locigal designs.
Ofcourse there should be relavent topics.
Feedbacks- User get feedback by others learnens and facilators
clear interface- learnes dont be confused where they get needful learning objects
clear information- there are evaltion criteriars and goals, also tasks
involvment- I think its very important. Learners and facilator must be purposeful and
motivated to do many tasks
What was the most important thing you learned this week? What kind of
questions/ideas/experiences this week’s activities raised for you?
I have learned new methods. Most important thing what I have learend was how to do group work if you cant meet others
group members. For me it was first time do to group work in this way. One thing is how we get agreement which tools we can use. Second important thing is how management this group. I think I learned from every member something.
Describe what has changed in your personal learning environment and in group environment?
I think in my personmal learning environment nothing has changed. In group environment I am using collobration tools which I used before rarely.
Find at least one good and one bad example case of course design and reflect your opinions of these courses in your personal Weblog. Visit the blogs of your groupmates, read their reflections of course designs and add your opinions as comments about these courses.
I havent take part of following courses. I search them to topic which I have intrest and where I want to particpating.
Introduction to USA history
Information are well structured
Well-defined evaluation criteria
Well-defined goal
Information is cleared and its easy to read
Photoshop
Evaluation Criteria is missing
Course facilator is missing
A few information about Photoshop tools
Information hasent well structured I think this is information is not easy to follow.
example goals are defined almost in the end
Oh, those were interesting examples. I already thought I would send the link of your good course to our English teachers to teach US history main facts, and the other course seemed thrilling enough to start studying the materials. It seemed a bit "half-baked", but interesting - packed with information!
ReplyDeleteKetlin you have participated in a few e-courses for sure, haven't you? What about your experience with e-courses?
Nice to know that your group work is progressing and this is a new experience for you. Hopefully it will give you more positive experiences than negative :)
ReplyDeleteAbout course design components. In general these are valid points. However, I am not sure if I understood everything. What do you mean by good grammatics?
I like the examples of the good and bad courses as we can really learn something from these.
Cheers,
Terje